Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Could even put a call to arms up on the main blog and gauge interest from the readership. We’ve already got a solid core of regular contributors whom I imagine might be interested in something like this.
You may also find some people experienced in web design who might be able to help.
The existing articles on GP are a very eclectic mix, and I’m talking about a very specific targeted collection of articles intended to peel back the veneer of establishment and media lies and show the reader what’s really been going on.
Ideally I think I’d want something on the front page of the site that catches the attention of visitors – perhaps listing the three or four most recent articles and linking to the repository itself.
The repository could be organised along categories such as politics, economics, culture, media, etc. The kind of articles you might expect to find would be:
Politics – the recent series about how Labour betrayed the working classes would be excellent, perhaps a summary of the MP’s expenses scandal, how Brexit is being sabotaged, how our foreign policy is dictated by Riyadh.
Economics – an explanation for the layman of our current financial system, fiat currencies, how we went off the gold standard, the deficit and debt problem.
Culture – the erasing of British identity, the atomisation of community, multiculturalism, political correctness, the polls carried out among British muslims regarding their views towards certain issues.
History – why the British Empire wasn’t evil, the truth about slavery, how everyone goes nuts over the Nazis but the Communists get a free pass.
Media – Over representation of ethnic minorities in the media, promotion of miscegenation in advertising campaigns, biased BBC, the extreme views regularly touted in the Guardian.
There would be a lot of crossover between the articles of course, in fact we’d probably need a better selection of categories so we could cover modern politicised policing, child rape by Pakistani migrants. I also reckon it would be worth having some kind of peer review system where an article was checked by the other authors before being published just to make sure it didn’t have an glaring errors or clangers that would diminish or undermine the impact of the article. In fact the pool of authors could be used to bounce ideas off each other, point each other to useful resources and suggest edits/additions to the articles before they’re published.
The objective would be to educate and inform existing GPers on subjects they may not be aware of or have only limited knowledge of, but also to present the normie visitor with new narratives and analysis which they would never have got at school or from the establishment media.
I absolutely understand it would require a lot of work, but I reckon we could put together a decent team of writers and work out a way to catalogue these articles and present them on the site. My web design skills are non-existent, but I’d be more than happy to contribute articles and review articles written by others.
The more I think about this the more the idea grows on me.
We’ve had excellent series of articles written here by GPers on how the Labour Party has systematically betrayed the working class, on the staggering and brazen corruption of the Clintons – these articles should be put front and centre for the visitor to read… want to know more? Well here’s links to YT videos by Molyneux, Black Pigeon Speaks, PJW, the Iconoclast, etc etc.
Reach out to UKIP, For Britain, D&V and invite their figures to make an appearance here, submit their own articles outlining their vision, their objectives, etc. Ask the readers to submit questions which can be collected and presented for a written response by the leaders of those parties. This I think would be of interest to the likes of For Britain and D&V as they struggle to raise their profile in the deliberate absence of coverage from the establishment media.
Potentially you could turn GP into a portal or hub for the redp-pilled, where ideas can be shared and users linked to useful resources or information, coordinate activism but also with a strong element of welcoming normies who may be at least vaguely interested in breaking free of the establishment narrative.
